“Sce has no borders, but stists have a holand. And there are historical bottolines and sce that we st uphold.”
（感谢您对我研究方法‘精致’的评价。科学无国界，但科学家有祖国。更有必须坚守的历史底线和良知。）
他清晰地看到那位日本学者的嘴角撇了一下，似乎想反驳。
沈知时没有给他机会，他上前半步，更靠近讲台的边缘，拉近了与听众的距离，声音陡然提高，右手随之抬起，食指指尖不自觉地指向桌面，强调着每一个字，它们像裹着冰雹，重重砸在寂静的空气里：“If you are questioning the soury data, the processing workflow, or the thodological rigor in paper, I , and would be very willing to, provide here the access paths to all the raw data, links to the detailed data processing script code repositories — everything is transparent and open, wele for ao i and replicate at any ti! This is the fual principle of the stifiunity!”
（如果您质疑的是我论文中数据的来源、处理流程或方法论上的严谨性，我可以，也非常乐意，在此提供全部的原始数据访问路径、详细的数据处理脚本代码仓库链接——一切透明、开放，欢迎任何人在任何时间进行检验和复现！这是科学共同体的基本准则！）
他的语速加快，胸膛因激动而明显起伏：“However, if your question is based on a nihilistic, or even deliberately distorted attitude towards historical truth! Then, with all due respect,” 他的右手猛地挥起，在空中划过一个短促而有力的弧线，随即紧紧握成拳头，压在胸口，” this has trahe scope of acadec discussion! This is a desecration of the tless i lives lost in historical tragedies! It is a challeo basic hun sce!”
（但是，如果您的问题，是建立在一种对历史真相虚无主义的、甚至是刻意歪曲的态度之上！那么，恕我直言，这已经超出了学术讨论的范畴！这是对在历史悲剧中罹难的无数无辜生命的亵渎！是对人类基本良知的挑战！）
全场鸦雀无声，落针可闻。那位日本学者的脸色由红转青，张了张嘴，试图辩解什么：“I didn''''t ……”
“Are you sure? You ntioned Nanjing''''s ‘past’? Ok!” 沈知时毫不留情地打断他，声音因汹涌的情感而带着无法抑制的颤抖，但每一句话都异常清晰，如同刻印在空气里，“The''''s talk about this uable ‘past’! In the winter of 1937, the Japanese invading ar in a''''s then-capital, Nanjing, carried out weeks anized, planned, preditated ss rder! Over 300,000 civilians and disard soldiers were brutally killed! This is one of the darkest chapters of the Sed World War, an iron-clad fact widely reized by the iional unity! If you, or any colleague present here, have doubts about this—”
（您提到了南京的‘过往’？好！那我们就谈谈这段不容忘却的‘过往’！1937年的冬天，侵华日军在当时的中国首都南京，进行了长达数周的有组织、有计划、有预谋的大屠杀！三十万以上的平民和放下武器的士兵惨遭杀害！这是第二次